polanskiman
Comments
-
I actually tried logging out to see if the discussions were there and they were.Anyways seems they are now gone.
-
John... seems you've got some work here!
-
Noted with thanks. Rig mining on your P2Pool as we are talking.
-
Thanks. It seems to work ok except that the website is a bit buggy. The admin just answered to me though that they are on the process of updating the whole backend. So let's see!For the sink option, ok noted. I have tried that …What's your fee for the P2Pool LTC by the way? I've also noticed a high level of reject in the P2Pool compared to traditional pools. Why is that?Btw you can find me at LfUcGtsJVGigcyTZZuaDcMfwJRoogg7g9ZSome bugs really need to be fixed on the Discussions front.
Is this up and running?
What's true though is that the Maxpool I was in closed recently
Luckily I was not active on that pool!!
On the moderation part. I can't seem to see any options to moderate the forum apart the "sink" option next to each discussion. Is that all?
It's probably your Google Chrone who is configured to open new tabs each time you click a link.Quark Wallet doesn't have a miner. Maxcoin does though.MacMiner is not a wallet it's a miner while Quark Wallet is as its name indicates a wallet. You can definitely use MacMiner to mine Quarkcoins, but also Bitcoins, Maxcoins, Dogecoins, Litecoins etc etc.Hope this helps.@OldTimer This would only apply to Bitcoin as there is no ASICs designed for other alternative coins. At least none has seen the light yet although you see some webs…Oh, so the correct number of shares are the ones in the API output, not the ones on the miner window. Too bad... Email sent.I do understand. The first part of the log though shouldn't be flushed. It gives the user a reference to know when the miner started and under what conditions.The Accepted/Rejected number of shares is what you see next to the MH on the top of the miner window? Correct? If so, those numbers are not those being reported into the API Output Accepted and Rejected Columns. The share numbers are reported in the…- I don't mind (and Ithink it's good from a technical standpoint) to have the log of what is happening. The problem is that you've configured MacMiner to a maximim log view which stops the user from seeing what happened 2 hours ago for example. What…I have seen that the pool setting bug has been corrected although several others are still there.I also have a few suggestions for the next update:- Review all previously reported bugs by users and t…For an auto update that seems a bit too short. I would be you I would extend that to a day or two minimun. I will try the new version.V.1.5.18 crashed today. I launched the app in the morning and crashed around noon. I have sent you the crash log. cgminer didn't crash though and kept mining in the background.Yeap. I haven't seen any crashes of cgminer since those ones this morning and I have been running 1.5.17c all day long
Maybe. Those cgminer crashes were under MacMiner 1.5.17b and they all happened at the same time, 20 of them.I also saw a load of crash reports from cgminer in my DiagnosticReport folder. Need that too?I do. Sending it now by email.No worries. Also, I had a nasty crash with 1.5.18 few minutes ago. I was configuring Dogecoin and I forgot to input the port. The log was telling me he could not connect. I realised I had forgotten the port. I went back to input the port in the pool…Will the bugs that I reported on 1.5.16b be fixed in the next update?My apologies, I renamed an old app with v.1.5.18. That is what happens when you do 5 things at the same time! You can delete my comments here as they are useless.There seems to be a problem with the release number. You've called it v.1.5.18 but it appears to be 1.5.17c. When I open the app it tells me that I have 1.5.17c and that I need to update to v.1.5.18. When I check in the "About MacMiner" section inde…Found another bug or let's say more of an enhancement to the code that could be done. Each miner window have different sizes horizontally when reduced to their minimum. Perhaps this could be polished a bit to give to each windows the same minimum si…